<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bubble-Gate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artistadventurer.com/cms/archives/50/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artistadventurer.com/cms/archives/50</link>
	<description>Bringing you idiosynchratic moments from fortuitous events and random places.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnnaTude</title>
		<link>http://www.artistadventurer.com/cms/archives/50/comment-page-1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>AnnaTude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artistadventurer.com/cms/archives/50#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Um . . . yeah, another reason for smart people to work the polls! And how blurry are the lines of gullibilty/accountability in the Chicago vote? I mean, would you buy the &#039;invisible ink&#039; excuse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um . . . yeah, another reason for smart people to work the polls! And how blurry are the lines of gullibilty/accountability in the Chicago vote? I mean, would you buy the &#8216;invisible ink&#8217; excuse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://www.artistadventurer.com/cms/archives/50/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artistadventurer.com/cms/archives/50#comment-45</guid>
		<description>In Chicago, a bunch of voters were given pens that didn&#039;t work. When they complained, both pollworkers and election judges told them that the pens were &quot;invisible ink&quot;. The marks wouldn&#039;t show up, but the vote would count. This was, uh, not the case. No invisible ink pens. 

Ah, the joy of Chicago politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Chicago, a bunch of voters were given pens that didn&#8217;t work. When they complained, both pollworkers and election judges told them that the pens were &#8220;invisible ink&#8221;. The marks wouldn&#8217;t show up, but the vote would count. This was, uh, not the case. No invisible ink pens. </p>
<p>Ah, the joy of Chicago politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

